While COVID-19 can hardly be called a major public health threat anymore, having now reached endemic status (like the seasonal flu), the fearmongerers who need this crisis to continue in order to complete the implementation of a Great Reset of the global economy and social structure arenâ€™t letting up.
In a mid-March 2021 appearance on MSNBC News, National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins expressed dismay at the publicâ€™s display of independence, saying:
â€œOh my God, Florida, stay out of the bars with your masks off! What are you doing? This is exactly the wrong thing to be doing unless you want to end up where Europe is.â€�
Heâ€™s referring to a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 that is, allegedly, now â€œcausing so many problemsâ€� in Europe. But is it really? To be clear, there will be many new variants of this virus, just as the seasonal flu changes and evolves from year to year. The thing is, as viruses mutate within a population over time, they tend to become more benign.
Mutations: ‘Much Ado About Nothingâ€™
As reported by Mary Petrone, Ph.D., and Nathan Grubaugh, assistant professor in the department of epidemiology and microbial diseases at Yale, in a March 2020 CNN Health article:1
â€œA recent scientific article suggested that the novel coronavirus responsible for the Covid-19 epidemic has mutated into a more â€˜aggressiveâ€™ form. Is this something we need to worry about? No, and hereâ€™s why â€¦
The effects of mutation in real life are nuanced and generally innocuous. Using the idea of mutation to incite fear is harmful, especially in the midst of an epidemic like COVID-19 â€¦
The genetic material of the virus is RNA, not DNA like in humans. Unlike with human DNA, when viruses copy their genetic material, it does not proofread its work. Because RNA viruses essentially operate without a spell-check, they often make mistakes.
These â€˜mistakesâ€™ are mutations, and viruses mutate rapidly compared to other organisms. While this might sound frightening, mistakes during replication usually produce changes that are neutral or even harmful to the newly generated virus. Neutral mutations, which neither improve nor hinder viruses’ survival, may continue to circulate without any noticeable change in the people they infect.
Mutations that are harmful to the viruses are less likely to survive and are eliminated through natural selection. Fortunately, when mutations occur that help a virus spread or survive better, they are unlikely to make a difference in the course of an outbreak.
Viral traits such as infectiousness and disease severity are controlled by multiple genes, and each of those genes may affect the virus’ ability to spread in multiple ways. For example, a virus that causes severe symptoms may be less likely to be transmitted if infected people are sick enough to stay in bed.
As such, these traits are like blocks in a Rubik’s cube; a change in one characteristic will change another. The chances of a virus navigating these complex series of trade-offs to become more severe during the short timescale of an outbreak are extremely low.â€�
The Ever-Moving Goal Post
If youâ€™ve paid attention, youâ€™ve likely noticed that the goal post for â€œpublic safetyâ€� has been moved further and further away as weâ€™ve gone along. At regular intervals, thereâ€™s been another Chicken Little warning that the sky is still falling and that we must not let down our guard.
First it was the number of deaths that was cause for alarm. Now we know that many of the so-called COVID-19 deaths were not, in fact, caused by the virus, while erroneous epidemiological models predicted millions of deaths lest drastic measures were taken.
As PCR testing took off, rising â€œcaseâ€� loads seemed to confirm such dire predictions, sparking widespread panic. With 20/20 hindsight, we now realize that the cycle thresholds of these tests were set so high that even healthy, uninfected and noninfectious people tested positive.
This, in turn, allowed for the myth of asymptomatic spread to take root, and that then became the fear trigger, with everyone being a potential threat, no matter how healthy they appear.
The solution offered was for everyone to wear a mask at all times. Or two. Or perhaps three. Fortunately, even the experts backed off from suggestions of four layers. Yet, from the start, we knew, based on published science, that masks donâ€™t work against viruses.
As â€œcasesâ€� skyrocketed in tandem with fraudulent PCR testing, we were then told the best thing to do is shut everything down for two weeks to prevent overloading hospitals. Stay home, save a life, let the virus die out.
But even though hospitals remained at functional capacity in most areas, as â€œcasesâ€� (read false positives) continued to rise, two-week lockdowns were turned into three weeks, then four. In some areas, lockdowns dragged on for months, yet it didnâ€™t seem to have the desired effect on the case load. By this time, hospital capacity was entirely forgotten.
As lockdowns continued and people started to grumble, the â€œexpertsâ€� in charge of this global organization (or more accurately, reorganization) warned that this was the new normal. Settle in. Get used to it. The virus doesnâ€™t seem to be going anywhere, so our only hope is a vaccine. We just have to keep it together until then, and then weâ€™ll all be safe again.
Alas, flies in the ointment appeared in the form of inexpensive treatments that worked just fine, and scientists and medical doctors sharing concerns about these novel â€œvaccinesâ€� that really arenâ€™t and the public health dangers of lockdowns.
Censorship unlike anything the world has ever seen before was launched, and vaccine-deniers became the new enemy â€” worse even than those pesky asymptomatic healthy people that refuse to wear a mask.
Something had to be done about free thinkers and question-raisers, and so the goal post was moved again. The whole world, all 7-plus billion people, must get vaccinated, or else weâ€™re all toast. This way, people will turn on each other and force each other to comply and stop with the questioning.
And so it continues. The sky hasnâ€™t fallen yet, but weâ€™re promised that unless we comply, it surely will. Any day now. Just a matter of time. Obey, and the experts will make sure we survive the inevitable pandemonium. Now, vaccine passports are being rolled out, and both private companies and entire nations are considering restricting any sense of normalcy to vaccinated-only. Arenâ€™t you tired of chasing the goal post yet?
Chicken Littleâ€™s Puppet Masters
In a Wall Street Journal essay2 published March 18, 2021, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis urges readers not to trust â€œthe elites,â€� pointing out that â€œInfluential people in public health, government and the mediaâ€� have â€œfailed to rise to the moment.â€� He goes on:
â€œThe COVID-19 pandemic represented a test of elites in the U.S., from public-health experts to the corporate media. The results have been disappointing. Policy makers who bucked the elites and challenged the narrative have been proven right to do so.
To begin with, highly publicized epidemiological models were as consequential as they were wrong â€¦ The lockdowns failed to stop the virus but did a great deal of societal damage along the way â€” damage that a more targeted approach, seeking to reduce total harms, would have been able to avoid (and did, in places like Sweden and Florida) â€¦
Elites sent conflicting messages about the efficacy of cloth masks, the uniformity of risk across age brackets, the danger of outdoor transmission â€¦ Perhaps most damaging to public trust was the public-health campaign urging â€˜15 Days to Slow the Spreadâ€™ â€¦ Going from â€˜save the hospitalsâ€™ to â€˜zero COVIDâ€™ represents one of the greatest instances in history of moving the goal post â€¦
While it was abundantly clear by May that schools represented low-risk environments for the spread of COVID and that the consequences of prolonged school closures were potentially catastrophic, the corporate media did its best to obscure the data and stoke fear and panic among parents and teachers.
Had the media presented the data on schools in a rational fashion with proper context and perspective â€¦ millions of students would be in markedly better shape academically and socially.
For months we were told to â€˜trust the experts,â€™ but far too often over the past year those who were most influential in our society â€” in public health, government and media â€” proved incapable of rising to the moment â€¦ We cannot simply undo the harm caused by flawed policies advocated by our elites, but we can resolve that we never let this happen to our country again.â€�
Whoâ€™s in Charge, Really?
DeSantisâ€™ definition of â€œelitesâ€� is basically prominent public health and corporate media leaders. That may be appropriate for the critique offered in his article, but even these influential individuals are mere foot soldiers in the bigger scheme of things.
Above them towers a pyramidical power structure populated by globalist entities â€” nongovernmental organizations, think-tanks, private corporations and billionaire philanthropists â€” many of which weâ€™ve never even heard of, and who rule without being seen.
In fact, one of the most influential yet universally overlooked global powerhouses, the Swedish Wallenberg family dynastyâ€™s motto is â€œEsse non videri,â€� or in Swedish, â€œAtt verka utan att synas,â€�3 which translates into â€œTo operate without being seen.â€�
The Wallenbergsâ€™ involvement in banking, and technological and power infrastructure grants them immense power over entire nations, not to mention the global intelligence and surveillance apparatus as a whole.
I suspect that in the final analysis, we will find the little country of Sweden may actually be a most significant power player in the Great Reset. The hope, of course, is that by exposing this nefarious global takeover plan, we can stop it and reverse course.
Fauci Called Out for His Theatrical Performance
More locally we have Dr. Anthony Fauci, who surely qualifies as an elitist pharmaceutical priest whose advice we ought to balance with more rational perspectives. In a recent Senate hearing over the COVID-19 pandemic, Sen. Rand Paul confronted Fauci about his mask recommendations, saying:4,5
“You’re telling everybody to wear a mask, whether they’ve had an infection or a vaccine. What I’m saying is that they have immunity, and everybody agrees they have immunity.
What studies do you have that people that have had the vaccine or have had the infection â€¦ are spreading the infection? If we’re not spreading the infection, isn’t it just theater? You’ve had the vaccine and you’re wearing two masks, isn’t that theater?”
When Fauci tries to defend his position by bringing up the issue of new variants that the vaccine may or may not defend against, which he says necessitates the use of a mask even if vaccinated, Paul strikes back saying:
â€œWhat studies show significant reinfection, hospitalization and death from the variants? None in our country. Zero. Youâ€™re making your policy based on conjecture. You have the conjecture that weâ€™re going to get variants so you want people to wear a mask for another couple of years.
Youâ€™ve been vaccinated and you parade around in two masks for show. You canâ€™t get it again â€¦ Youâ€™re defying everything we know about immunity by telling people to wear masks who have been vaccinated â€¦ If you have immunity, [wearing a mask] is theatre. Youâ€™re wearing a mask to give comfort to others. Youâ€™re not wearing a mask because of any science.â€�
Masks and Social Distancing Here to Stay?
In related news, BBC News reports mask wearing and social distancing in the U.K. may need to continue for â€œseveral years.â€�6 So says Mary Ramsay, head of immunization at Public Health England. Another extension on the foreign holiday (vacation) ban is also being considered.
The reason, again, is that no one can be free until the whole world has gotten vaccinated. The idea being presented, as DeSantis pointed out, is that we now have to reach a COVID-free state before we can start living life again. Meaning, as long as thereâ€™s a single specimen of SARS-CoV-2 anywhere on the planet, the whole world is at risk, as it will spread and grow, so no one can live as they please until the virus has been eradicated.
The goal post is now so far in the future, we canâ€™t even see a glimmer of it in the distance anymore. The old saying, â€œGive them an inch and theyâ€™ll take a mile,â€� seems apt at this point.
At some stage, you must realize that the more you give in and obey, the more you have to give in and obey. There really is no end to what they can take from you, and holding on to the belief that your government would never [fill in the blank] is becoming more dangerous by the day.
Itâ€™s also important to realize that your government isnâ€™t the ultimate power. Our government officials take orders too, believe it or not, from what is now commonly known as the deep state. Itâ€™s not a government at all, but a global, hidden power structure that is accountable to no one, while influencing and manipulating everyone to bring about a new world order.
The New World Order
In years past, this shadowy cabal of power brokers were referred to under the term the New World Order. In 2020, the World Economic Forum came out on the public stage and announced the Great Reset, which is nothing but the NWO rebranded. So, itâ€™s a conspiracy no more.
In the video above, investigative journalist Harry Vox talks about disease outbreaks, quarantines and curfews being essential tools in the ruling classâ€™ toolkit, and how these tools were planned to be used to usher in the next phase of control.
The interview, which took place seven years ago, sounds more than a little prophetic today, as these three indispensable tools for totalitarian control have been part of our reality for the past 12 months. In it, Vox also refers to â€œScenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,â€� a document by the Rockefeller Foundation, in which they lay out their â€œLockstepâ€� scenario, which details the global response to a lethal pandemic.
The Lockstep Scenario
While the name and origin of the virus differs, the scenario laid out in this document matches many of the details of our present. A deadly viral pandemic. A deadly effect on economies. International mobility coming to a screeching halt, debilitating industries, tourism and global supply chains. â€œEven locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers,â€� the document reads.
â€œIn the absence of official containment protocols,â€� the virus spread like wildfire. In this narrative, the U.S. administrationâ€™s failure to place strict travel restrictions on its citizens proved to be a fatal flaw, as it allowed the virus to spread past its borders. China, on the other hand, fared particularly well due to its rapid imposition of universal quarantines of all citizens, which proved effective for curbing the spread of the virus.
Many other nations where leaders â€œflexed their authorityâ€� and imposed severe restrictions on their citizens â€” â€œfrom the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries of communal spaces like train stations and supermarketsâ€� â€” also fared well.
Listen to the disbelief in the interviewerâ€™s voice when he asks if Vox actually believes that such a thing could happen, that we would have to stand in line to get our temperature checked before entering a building.
Well, every single one of us has now had to do this at least a few times, so we know itâ€™s possible. And if thatâ€™s possible, why not the rest of the Lockstep plan, which tells us that: â€œEven after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck, and even intensified.â€�
We can no longer afford to disbelieve the lengths to which the globalist elites, the unelected deep state, can and will go to seize total control over our global resources and people. Theyâ€™ve already told us what the ultimate plan is â€” to use bioterrorism to take control of the worldâ€™s resources, wealth and people.
All we need to do is to believe it, and realize that the only thing giving them the power to impose their will is our fear. As long as we choose fear and demand our government keep us safe from pathogens, they have every chance of winning.
To learn more about the hidden power structure running this global reorganization toward authoritarian control, see â€œBill Gates Wants to Realize Global Vision in His Lifetime,â€� â€œThe Great Reset and Build Back Better,â€� â€œTechnocracy and the Great Resetâ€� and â€œWho Pressed the Great Reset Button?â€�