The video above features the first of several tribunals1 on COVID-19, in which we expose the willful misconduct that runs like a red thread through the entire pandemic narrative. This first one is sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a 501c3 nonprofit organization chartered to educate and empower you with information that promotes health and happiness for you and your family.
The panel, consisting of a number of experts from different fields, including scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys, is hosted by Alexis Baden-Mayer. The topic, of course, is COVID-19, which has risen as the most important topic of our lifetime.
Collectively, the panelists, which include yours truly, have spent well over 75,000 hours investigating myriad events that make up the global response to COVID-19, from its likely lab origin, to where we are at present. As noted by Baden-Mayor, we find ourselves “trapped in a web of questionable science and rampant acts of alleged willful misconduct with no apparent and insight.”
“Collectively, our panelists have published groundbreaking books, lawsuits and peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts on the subject of COVID-19 that currently form the foundation of many ongoing legal efforts, attempting to protect the inalienable rights of billions of good people worldwide,” Baden-Mayor says.
“It has been more than a year since the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into public awareness, and what began as two weeks to flatten the curve has morphed into a never-ending emergency. Is this still an emergency? And if so, why are we empowering the same people to lead us who have already proven their own incompetence?
At the very least tonight, we will take up the work that should have been performed long ago by mainstream media networks that have consistently vacated their duty to impartially investigate and objectively inform their audiences. We will ask the hard questions to people who have been censored and vilified simply for lifting their voices to help people throughout the world.
Some of the questions we pose may feel uncomfortable at first, but are nevertheless essential to our collective freedom and our children’s future. And some of the answers you hear may challenge the narratives you’ve been conditioned to accept. We will listen as our expert panelists share verifiable information, and invite you to decide for yourself whether the information you are hearing has merit.
This tribunal does not exist to tell you what to think or what you need to know. This tribunal of experts has gathered to empower you, to think for yourself and create opportunities for you to take action.
The alleged acts of willful conduct threaten not only our freedom, but also unnecessarily prolongs the crisis by preventing the free exchange of ideas and clinical information that saves lives. We will embark on a historic journey together in search of answers to hard questions and solutions to challenging problems â€¦
If you are like the billions of people who have felt that something just isn’t right, and you don’t know who to trust. I assure you, you are not alone. Take heart and have courage together. We are going to make sure COVID-19 comes to an end. And most importantly never happens again.”
The speakers and panelists featured in this first tribunal, in addition to myself, are:
Dolores Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist,2 founder of the World Freedom Alliance3 and a member of the World Doctors Alliance,4 which is committed “to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life-limiting practices detrimental to the well-being of all living men women and children”
Kimberly and Foster Gamble, creators of two THRIVE documentaries5
Kevin Jenkins, executive director of the Urban Global Health Alliance6 and producer of the censored documentary film “Medical Racism: The New Apartheid”7
Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and co-author of “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection” in the American Journal of Medicine.8,9 McCullough is one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States
Joy Fritz, a former death records clerk10 and contributor to The Defender11
Ronnie Cummins, co-founder and international director of the OCA and its Mexican affiliate Via Organica12
Tara Thorton, co-founder of the Freedom Angels Foundation, which fights against tightening vaccination regulations13
Dr. James Lyon Weiler, Ph.D., a research scientist, president and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge14
Anna Garner, founder of New Mexico Stands Up!, a volunteer-driven organization that provides public interest legal services to restore essential rights and health freedom15
Dr. Henry Ealy (“Dr. H”), a certified holistic nutritionist, founder and executive community director of the Energetic Health Institute16
Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMed Info17
David “Avocado” Wolfe, a raw food advocate18
The Truth About COVID-19
The first roundtable discussion starts off with a prerecorded video featuring Cummins and me. Our full-length discussion was summarized in “The Book You’ll Want to Read Before It Disappears.” I’ve included it again, above, for your convenience. The book in question is “The Truth About COVID-19,” which we wrote together.
In that book, we review how the COVID-19 pandemic was never a pandemic in any real, historical sense, the tactics used to keep the fraud going, the likely origin of the virus, the less-than-humanitarian intentions driving the pandemic narrative as a whole, censored prevention and treatment strategies, the potential hazards of COVID-19 “vaccines,” why vaccine passports are a ticket to totalitarianism and much more.
Shocking Statistics Are Being Ignored
Anyone who has looked at the U.S. federal vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) will be struck by the shockingly high number of serious injuries and deaths occurring after receiving the COVID-19 “vaccine.”
Many of these occur within the first 24 to 48 hours after taking the vaccine, which ought to raise automatic questions. Yet the timing of these injuries and deaths are ignored, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration insists that none of them has any relation to the vaccines,19 which simply isn’t believable. As noted by Baden-Mayor:
“As of April 16 , the following information is confirmed: At least 3,186 Americans have died after receiving experimental COVID injections. At least 1,015 of those deaths have occurred within 24 hours. According to the various medical records, at least 115 expecting mothers have spontaneously aborted their babies or given birth to stillborn babies after receiving experimental COVID injections.
At least 86,080 Americans have reported some form of injury post-injection, including at least 6,282 people who have required hospitalization due to the severity of their injuries.
We support everyone’s right to access experimental COVID injections, but it is important to note that they are not FDA approved. Currently the clinical trials are ongoing until October 27, 2022, for Moderna, the NIH study until January 2, 2023, for Johnson & Johnson, and April 6, 2023, for the Pfizer-BioNTech.
Under current informed consent laws, you have the right to decline the use of any experimental product without fear of job loss, discrimination or segregation from the society that you paid taxes to support. It is your body. It is your choice.”
Side Effect Reports Are Skyrocketing
These numbers are skyrocketing by the day. As of April 23, 2021, the total number of adverse reports had jumped to 118,902, 12,618 of which were serious and 3,544 of which died.20 While shocking as is, the real numbers are undoubtedly even higher, as VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on voluntary reporting.
Historically, less than 10% of vaccine side effects are reported to VAERS.21 An investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services put it as low as 1%.22,23
What this means is side effects may actually be 10 times or even 100 times higher than reported. We could, in reality, be looking at anywhere from 126,000 to 1.2 million serious side effects, and anywhere from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths already.
Making matters even worse, it appears VAERS is backlogged by about three months, so the data you see on VAERS does not reflect the true, real-time numbers of adverse reactions being reported.
This is important to know, since the system’s primary goal is to “detect new, unusual or rare vaccine adverse events” as a way to monitor safety of vaccines, and the greater the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine. A backlog by months also suggests an enormous number of adverse effects are happening, and that in and of itself is incredibly disturbing.
It is also highly likely that the majority of the deaths from the vaccine will be due to antibodyâ€�dependent enhancement (ADE) or paradoxical immune enhancement (PIE), as detailed in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System” and “Will Vaccinated People Be More Vulnerable to Variants?“
We will not see these deaths until the fall, because that is the typical season when coronavirus infections occur, be it SARS-CoV2 or other coronaviruses responsible for the common cold. So, when exposed to a wild coronavirus, there is indeed a risk that ADE response, due to pathogenic priming, will produce an excessive and potentially lethal immune reaction.
Steadfast Suppression of Attempts to Save Patients
As noted by McCullough during the roundtable discussion, something very unusual happened in 2020. For the first time, doctors around the world were actively discouraged and prevented from saving their patients. There was “an enormous, complete, pervasive, steadfast suppression of any attempts to help patients with COVID-19,” he says.
He points out that esteemed medical facilities have developed effective treatment protocols for COVID-19, including Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Emory, yet these have all been suppressed and censored.
“It’s stunning,” McCullough says. “By this time, we should be using the Harvard protocol, the Emory protocol. How about Hopkins? I’ll take any one of them â€¦ We seem to somehow have developed a uniform game plan â€¦ to do nothing to help patients with COVID-19, passively allow as much suffering hospitalization and death as possible, create enormous amounts of fear in our society, and then be prepared for mass vaccination.”
Willfully Inflated Death Counts
Fritz, a certified death reporting clerk who has worked for years assisting doctors and acting as an interface between funeral homes and state and federal reporting agencies, is now helping families correct death certificates that inaccurately list COVID-19 as the cause of death.
March 24, 2020, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a COVID alert that some say has led to significantly inflated and therefore fraudulent death counts.
In response to Baden-Mayor’s questions, “Did the COVID alert No. 2 lead to inflated dead counts? And what are some of the problems associated with the death certificate reporting that make the process susceptible to data manipulation and therefore significant inaccuracy?” Fritz replies:
“For context, the COVID No. 2 alert and the follow-up NBSS April guidance was issued within two weeks of the emergency being declared in March 2020. Their explicit guidance was given before there was any population-wide testing available to statistically determine the infection fatality rates, so we didn’t have probability [data] yet.
Yet, without any population surveillance available, any good data, they asserted that COVID would be the underlying cause of death ‘more often than not.’ They made a declaration of statistical probability before there was national statistics available. Then they disseminated this unfounded probabilistic rationale to those who officially report, approve, code and tally our mortality statistics.
People need to understand the importance of the underlying cause of death. If you look at a death certificate, it has a bunch of information on it. The underlying cause of death is the diagnostic code you pick to report in our mortality statistics. That’s the one cause that’s going to be reported about that patient. It’s very important.
Normally, before this, infections were not given as the underlying cause of death, for the most part, for patients over 60 years old. I got a lot of cases where the doctor is saying it was MRSA, an antibiotic-resistant form of staph that’s really hard to treat and can kill people.
The vital records registrars would reject death certificates that had underlying cause of death with MRSA and say, ‘Go back and ask the doctor what they were on medication for. Did they have diabetes? Did they have chronic illnesses?’ So, this flies in the face of what I was used to, as far as infections being highlighted as the underlying cause of death as a rule.”
Illogical COVID Rules Have Created a Statistical Mess
Fritz goes on to review what happened the last time the National Center for Health Statistics had a governing committee make recommendations regarding contagious or vaccine-preventable disease. On page 139 of the 2003 report from this panel, the committee asked how to address questions such as “Was a contagious disease present at time of death, or did the death result from a vaccine preventable disease?”
“The committee subgroup on death certificates decided against the death certificate being updated to include those risk factors,” Fritz says. The committee stated that “the death certificate is not a medical record and is not intended to include prevalence data.”
“This is a very important part of what the precedence was, before this pandemic, about contagious and vaccine-preventable diseases on death certificates,” Fritz says.
“They intentionally, in 2020, changed this with the COVID guidance. They created this lopsided reporting system â€” and they didn’t make it for all contagious diseases â€” they just made it for COVID. So, it’s naturally going to create a ballooning of reporting for this one contagious disease.
Then, if you look at the context, these are experts at our statistical regulatory bodies. They know about the statistics on death certificates and [the importance of] accuracy. These guys know that â€” according to peer-reviewed medical literature, across the board, in every continent in the world â€” 20% to 60% of our death certificates have the wrong or an inaccurate cause of death listed.
So, we have a major margin of error that these experts already knew about. And now they’re manipulating the system to milk out the information â€¦ without fixing the system. That’s very problematic.”
While Fritz is trying to help families correct death certificates that incorrectly list COVID-19 as the cause of death, that task just got more difficult. She recently received a text from her local government in California, advertising that FEMA is now giving families $9,000 to cover funeral expenses if your loved one died from COVID-19, and the way you prove that is with a death certificate listing COVID-19 as the cause of death.
What’s more, this payment program will go on to 2025, so it not only deincentivizes people from correcting death certificates issued in 2020, but incentivizes the continued mislisting of COVID-19 as the cause of death presently and into the future, using bribery.
Fritz is founding a nonprofit 501c3 organization called the Factual Reporting Advocacy Network to help educate families, medical officers, certifiers, mortuaries and others about the importance of accuracy in death certificates, because it affects national and global statistics, which in turn drive all sorts of funding, such as medical research.
She’s also pushing for an independent national audit of COVID-19 death records to establish true cause of death and to update the certificates accordingly.
Roundtable 2: The Medical Ethics Panel
The OCA tribunal, which is three hours long, features roundtables with nine additional panelists. I hope you take the time to listen to all of them. Roundtable 2, which begins at the 50-minute mark, includes Sayer Ji, Dr. Ealy and Jenkins, who discuss willful misconduct as it pertains to medical ethics.
Ji reviews how public health officials have failed to honor the ethics of medicine and what can be done to correct course and serve those who are desperately looking for answers. As noted by Ji, you cannot make ethical medical decisions unless you know both the risks and the benefits, so the censorship of medical information is, in a very real sense, a violation of human rights.
March 23, 2021, Ealy published a peer-reviewed paper, “COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During a Global Health Crisis â€” An Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct,” available for free reading and download on GreenMedInfo.24
In it, he substantiates McCullough’s allegation of rampant, wanton misconduct among public health officials, the active suppression of safe and effective treatments, and pandemic measures being implemented based on incorrect assumptions and outright lies.
One lie that allowed for the implementation of draconic measures was that SARS-CoV-2 was being spread asymptomatically. There’s no evidence of this, and from a virology standpoint, having a respiratory infection without symptoms is highly unlikely.
The PCR test being used as a diagnostic tool is also problematic, as revealed in the Corman-Drosten review,25 headed by former Pfizer chief scientist Dr. Michael Eaton. The test was developed before a viral isolate was available, which means we don’t even know if it’s detecting the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus. On top of that, health agencies instructed labs to use excessive amplification cycles, known to result in massive numbers of false positives.
Ealy also discusses a paper26 written in collaboration with team of other investigators published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, titled, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective.” This paper details how the CDC has enabled the corruption of case- and fatality-reporting data in violation of federal law.
The panelists also address racial disparities, such as how communities of color are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, both the illness and pandemic measures, and the U.S. government’s history of knowingly withholding evidence-based cures.
Ealy also points out that the CDC has known for the past 20 years that 35% to 45% of Americans are deficient in vitamin A; 37% to 46% are deficient in vitamin C; 65% to 95% are deficient in vitamin D; 60% to 84% are deficient in vitamin E; and 11% to 15% of Americans are deficient in zinc.
These are key nutrients to mount an effective immune response. Yet no guidance has been issued for correcting these widespread nutritional deficits â€” not in the past, and not now, even though a large body of research now shows vitamins C, D and zinc play a crucial role in preventing COVID-19 and improving outcomes.
You also don’t want to miss Jenkins’ impassioned speech in which he strips the pandemic down to the bare bones and exposes what it’s really all about. It’s about turning mankind into slaves. It’s about systemic annihilation. They want to control our bodies and minds, and to do that, they must first strip us of our freedom. That’s what this pandemic is all about.
“I’m here to hurt your feelings today,” Jenkins says. “I’m not here to make you feel good. The bottom line is you are â€¦ locked out of the truth because you’ve allowed it to happen. This is the year of action.
A year of taking it all back. This is a year of flying free â€¦ We are at war for humanity. This has nothing to do with race. Race is a distraction â€¦ Are they censoring because you are black or white? They’re censoring us because we’re telling the truth.
Big tech, big pharma, finance, education â€” they’re all working against us. We have failed, all of us. So, you’ve got to get up. Come join us at Urban Global Health. Come join us at Freedom Airways.27 Join all of the other groups.”
Roundtable 3: Questionable Science
Roundtable 3, which starts around the 1 hour 30-minute mark, includes Cahill, Lyons, Weiler and Garner, who review issues revolving around questionable science and the law. Cahill begins by reviewing the absolute lack of empirical evidence supporting the use of face masks, social distancing and lockdowns as a mitigation strategies to reduce viral spread.
Cahill’s organization, the World Freedom Alliance, recently launched the Hope & Accountability project, also known as The European Spring, which aims to hold decision-makers and doctors accountable for their scientific misconduct. Notices of liability are being sent off to members of the European Parliament, Presidents and Prime Ministers across Europe, as well as ministers for health and the regulators. She explains:
“A notice of liability, which is based in the rule of law, [specifies] that harm is not really done by big organizations. Harm is done by one man or woman to another man or a woman.
Responsibility rests on individual people, and on their roles, for example, the prime minister, the minister for health â€” but also the individual who is the head of the regulatory agency â€” that if there are several deaths in a country, the regulators â€¦ in each individual country, are required by law to stop the clinical trial.
They’re also required to give full informed consent so that everybody enrolled in these gene therapy, so-called vaccinations, are required to be informed about the adverse events. And you are not allowed to enroll people that cannot give consent, such as those with dementia â€¦
Under law, you are accountable as individuals for what you do, and what you fail to do. But of course, the person that’s most responsible is the person that actually put that needle into those people. And that, in our law is a severe crime, contributory manslaughter. So, the people who are involved in administering [these injections] â€¦ and cause huge [numbers of] adverse events and death, they will be accountable.”
Weiler delves into further details about the unscientific use of PCR tests, serious flaws in the tests’ design, the many ways in which false positives can be created, and the mechanics of how your immune system actually works to fight infection.
Landmark Court Filings Underway
Garner, an attorney and founder of New Mexico Stands Up! discusses potentially landmark cases filed in defense of American people, and the importance of relying evidence-based science when making public health decisions.
“We were doing what we can to get the word out and get it to the courts, which may be our last bastion â€” the wall that could fall down in terms of the lies that we’re being told,” she says. “We have been told so many lies, we’ve been told lies about the number of cases, we’ve been told lies about the number of deaths caused by COVID.
Fear has absolutely wrecked everybody’s sense of proportion of what’s right and wrong. And this is a battle of right versus wrong, because those of us who haven’t drunk the cocaine, as I call it, rather than the Kool-Aid, know that everything about this is so wrong.
We’ve been deprived of our fundamental inalienable God-given rights, our right to breathe oxygen, for goodness sake, our rights to socialize with our fellow man. We need hugs, we need socialization, especially as developing children. And that’s where our next level of litigation is going to take us.”
Garner recently sued the New Mexico Governor, challenging the state of public health emergency, which is based on lies, including the use of a basically meaningless test to diagnose infection.
“If that PCR test is considered to be the bottom card of this house of cards that we have been dealt, if we pull that out, I think the rest of the house of cards has to collapse,” she says. “And that means that the orders, the mandates, the restrictions that have been put in place as a result of this declaration are all null and void.”
Garner is also filing a case on behalf of children, based on a German victory, in which a mother sued, saying forcing her child to wear a mask at school and during fitness classes was child abuse. The judge agreed, ruling that it constitutes child abuse and granted injunctive relief. Garner’s case will be the first of that kind in the U.S.
“I can’t emphasize how much that people need to know what their rights are. If they don’t know what their rights are, they’re going to continue giving them up. And that’s exactly what they’ve done. They’ve given that their right to breathe.
They’ve given up their right to have free exercise of their religion with fellowship and singing, and sitting close to people in the bench. They have given up their rights to be able to assemble with their friends and family in numbers greater than five.
This whole thing is just insane. And those of us who are looking at this and going, ‘This is insane,’ need to realize that we’re the ones who aren’t insane, and try to help people come back to some level of reasonableness.”
Garner is in need of donations and volunteers, including brave, hard-nosed attorneys willing to fight for the rights and freedoms of Americans, so please donate or sign up to volunteer on NMstandup.org.
Roundtable 4: Creative Action
In Roundtable 4, starting around the 2 hour 18-minute mark, Wolfe, Thorton and the Fosters turn to the more spiritual side of things and discuss how we can nourish and inspire ourselves and others to take action on behalf of humanity. Again, I hope you watch this video in its entirety, and share it widely with everyone you know. Together, we can get through this, and, as you can see, you’re not alone.